The fallacy of evolutionists 🍂

The fallacy of evolutionists.

 

(1) Ease into ‘The original Text’ with Whitehead’s thoughts.

 

Yet in despite of this warning to avoid a mere phrase, I will start with a preliminary definition of the function of Reason, a definition to be illustrated, distorted, and enlarged, as this discussion proceeds.

The function of Reason is to promote the art of life.

In the interpretation of this definition, I must at once join issue with the evolutionist fallacy suggested by the prase “the survival of the fittest.”

The fallacy does not consist in believing that in the struggle for existence the fittest to survive eliminate the less fit.

The fact is obvious and stared us in the face.

The fallacy is the belief that fitness for survival is identical with the best exemplication of the Art of Life.

 

(2) The fallacy of evolutionists. What I have read is like this.

 

The argument of evolutionists that the surviving fittest eliminates the less fit is clear.

However, evolutionists do not provide concrete evidence for how the fittest survives the struggle for survival.

Whitehead presents the function of reason to improve the skills of life on a clear basis.

 

와이에이치파트너스 글로벌 출판프로젝트 🦅

​2022.9.14. 워드프레스(독점 해외판매망)오픈.

https://nomadsirius.kr

영문판 해외 판매처.

워드프레스(독점 판매망), 펜립(전세계 400개 스토어•20만개 도서관), 구글Books, 애플iBooks, 아마존Kindle.

​한영판 국내 판매처.

​유페이퍼(외 유통망), 교보, Yes24, 알라딘, 리디북스, 네이버스마트스토어.